Re: The actual LLVM integration patch

2005-11-28 Thread Chris Lattner
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Andrew Pinski wrote: I threw the current version of the patch up here: http://nondot.org/sabre/llvm-gcc-4.0-patch.tar.gz A couple of comments. getIntegerType is really badly. It seems better to use the mode to detect the type. Also maping 128bit fp type to {double, dou

Re: The actual LLVM integration patch

2005-11-28 Thread Andrew Pinski
> > > I threw the current version of the patch up here: > http://nondot.org/sabre/llvm-gcc-4.0-patch.tar.gz A couple of comments. getIntegerType is really badly. It seems better to use the mode to detect the type. Also maping 128bit fp type to {double, double} seems wrong for almost all targe

Re: The actual LLVM integration patch

2005-11-23 Thread Rafael EspĂ­ndola
On 11/22/05, Chris Lattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a patch vs the Apple branch as of a few weeks ago. The diff is in > gcc.patch.txt, the new files are included in the tarball. apple-local-200502-branch rev 104970 I think. Rafael