Re: Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes

2009-03-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Neil Vachharajani wrote: > Just to clarify is gcc.dg/tree-prof/wcoverage-mismatch.c an example of > what you are talking about? If so, I really like this is approach. Yes, it's that one. Paolo

Re: Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes

2009-03-30 Thread Neil Vachharajani
Just to clarify is gcc.dg/tree-prof/wcoverage-mismatch.c an example of what you are talking about? If so, I really like this is approach. Thanks for the feedback! Neil On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Janis Johnson wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-

Re: Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes

2009-03-30 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Janis Johnson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:53 -0700, Neil Vachharajani wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm working on a patch which makes FDO profile data more robust to >> source changes.  Before I sent the patch to the list for review, I was >> wondering how to write

Re: Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes

2009-03-30 Thread Janis Johnson
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:53 -0700, Neil Vachharajani wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on a patch which makes FDO profile data more robust to > source changes. Before I sent the patch to the list for review, I was > wondering how to write a test for this situation. In particular, what > I would li