On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Joel Sherrill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It now looks like the scan-tree-dump-times tests are the next
> easy group that isn't supported that needs to be marked as
> not supported. I didn't see anything obv
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr33804.c scan-tree-dump-time
Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
This one looks like another test slipping another unsupported
instruction by.
0x020012b8 : bne,pn %icc, 0x200138c
Is this UltraSPARC and not V7? Do we need two bad instructions
in the test case?
Executing on host: /home/joel/work-gnat/svn/b-gcc1-sparc/gcc/xgcc
Hello!
This one looks like another test slipping another unsupported
instruction by.
0x020012b8 : bne,pn %icc, 0x200138c
Is this UltraSPARC and not V7? Do we need two bad instructions
in the test case?
Executing on host: /home/joel/work-gnat/svn/b-gcc1-sparc/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/joel/work-gnat
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Joel Sherrill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> >
> >> Can someone familiar with VIS provide an instruction
> >> that is OK to do a run-time test with to check if
> >> it is supported?
> >>
> >
> > Perhaps this fragment fro
Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
Can someone familiar with VIS provide an instruction
that is OK to do a run-time test with to check if
it is supported?
Perhaps this fragment from testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tree-vect.h may help:
#elif defined(__sparc__)
asm volatile (".word\t0x81b007c0");
2008/3/13 Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Joel Sherrill
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Moving on the SPARC, I see a lot of similar
> >> unsupported instruction failures. I only
> >> see a
Hello!
Can someone familiar with VIS provide an instruction
that is OK to do a run-time test with to check if
it is supported?
Perhaps this fragment from testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tree-vect.h may help:
#elif defined(__sparc__)
asm volatile (".word\t0x81b007c0");
Uros.
Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Joel Sherrill
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Moving on the SPARC, I see a lot of similar
>> unsupported instruction failures. I only
>> see a single sparc feature test. It is for
>> "-multrasparc -mvis" and it
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Joel Sherrill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Moving on the SPARC, I see a lot of similar
> unsupported instruction failures. I only
> see a single sparc feature test. It is for
> "-multrasparc -mvis" and it is actually
> passing on the sparc instructio
