Re: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy

2007-11-26 Thread J.C. Pizarro
On 2007/11/26, Karthik Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Nov 27, 2007 12:13 AM, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007, Karthik Kumar wrote: > > > I would like to propose a set of diffs to enable compilation of gcc > > > without requiring flex/bison. I feel t

Re: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy

2007-11-26 Thread J.C. Pizarro
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007, Karthik Kumar wrote: > I would like to propose a set of diffs to enable compilation of gcc > without requiring flex/bison. I feel that this would greatly benefit > the variety of users building gcc. Dear Karthik Kumar, why not flex/bison? It's bad idea not using them. The to

Re: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy

2007-11-26 Thread David Daney
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:39:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote: I would like to propose a set of diffs to enable compilation of gcc without requiring flex/bison. I feel that this would greatly benefit the variety of users building gcc. Please be more concrete. I strong

Re: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy

2007-11-26 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:39:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote: > I would like to propose a set of diffs to enable compilation of gcc > without requiring flex/bison. I feel that this would greatly benefit > the variety of users building gcc. Please be more concrete. I strongly disagree that there