On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 16:00 +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > I'd have thought that a function-wide
> > > __attribute__((__string_section__(foo))
> > > wouldn't be a ton of work to implement.
> >
> > Maybe not.
> >
> > Could some future version of gcc mo
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> > I'd have thought that a function-wide
> > __attribute__((__string_section__(foo))
> > wouldn't be a ton of work to implement.
>
> Maybe not.
>
> Could some future version of gcc move string constants
> in a function to a specific section marked in
On 26 March 2015 at 23:15, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:58:40 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> > I'd have thought that a function-wide
>> > __attribute__((__string_section__(foo))
>> > wouldn't be a ton of work to implement.
>>
>> Maybe not.
>>
>> Could some future version of gc
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:58:40 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> > I'd have thought that a function-wide
> > __attribute__((__string_section__(foo))
> > wouldn't be a ton of work to implement.
>
> Maybe not.
>
> Could some future version of gcc move string constants
> in a function to a specific sec
(adding gcc@gcc.gnu.org)
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 14:40 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:49:06 +0100 Mathias Krause
> wrote:
>
> > Andrew, what's your opinion on such a patch set? Do you too think it's
> > useful? Or do you share Ingo's fear about the additional maintenance
> >
