Re: Stage 3 question

2010-11-05 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Paul Koning wrote: > On Nov 3, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > Question on what's appropriate... > > More on the same topic: sometimes the words are "bug fixes" and > sometimes "regressions". I tend to think of regressions as "it worked > in version x-1 but it's

Re: Stage 3 question

2010-11-05 Thread Paul Koning
On Nov 3, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > Question on what's appropriate... More on the same topic: sometimes the words are "bug fixes" and sometimes "regressions". I tend to think of regressions as "it worked in version x-1 but it's broken in x". Are long-standing bugs also fair game

Re: Stage 3 question

2010-11-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Andrew Pinski writes: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Paul Koning wrote: >> Question on what's appropriate... >> >> The doc section on machine dependent constraints is missing the PDP-11 ones. >>  Is that sort of doc change ok for stage 3?  Can I make that as a target >> maintainer (it says

Re: Stage 3 question

2010-11-03 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > Question on what's appropriate... > > The doc section on machine dependent constraints is missing the PDP-11 ones.   > Is that sort of doc change ok for stage 3?  Can I make that as a target > maintainer (it says that this covers "documentation