Hi Winfried,
> [..]
> > Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person
> [..]
>
> others like me might see it different:
> Spam discarding is evil and often hits an innocent person.
>
> Silently discarding a legal mail because of false spam-detection is
> the worst case f
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > You mean as with a failure response given to the SMTP DATA command?
> > This is actually equally evil as the resulting bounce (i.e. a delivery
> > failure notification, or a flood of them, once other MTAs have joined in a
> > response to a mass m
* Maciej W. Rozycki:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> > Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person whose address has
>> > been faked by the sender of spam, making the source of bounces not better
>> > than the originator.
>>
>> I expect this to be an SMTP-level re
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person whose address has
> > been faked by the sender of spam, making the source of bounces not better
> > than the originator.
>
> I expect this to be an SMTP-level rejection, not a bounce. source
Am 21.03.20 um 21:29 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc:
Hi -
since the change to the new list management, there has been
an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
bounces and that I would get removed from the list u
* Maciej W. Rozycki:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc wrote:
>
>> > > So, a request: Could the overseers either install more effective
>> > > spam protection for the list as a whole (preferred)
>>
>> Heh, if only it were that easy! Spam filtering was and is distinct
>> from mailin
Hello Maciej,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 09:22:31PM +, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
[..]
> Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person
[..]
others like me might see it different:
Spam discarding is evil and often hits an innocent person.
Silently discarding a legal mail
On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 13:08 -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:40 PM Thomas Koenig via Gcc <
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > since the change to the new list management, there has been
> > > an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
> >
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc wrote:
> > > So, a request: Could the overseers either install more effective
> > > spam protection for the list as a whole (preferred)
>
> Heh, if only it were that easy! Spam filtering was and is distinct
> from mailing list processing, and as you
Hi -
> > since the change to the new list management, there has been
> > an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
> > and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
> > bounces and that I would get removed from the list unless I
> > confirmed it (which I then did
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:40 PM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > since the change to the new list management, there has been
> > an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
> > and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
> > bounces and that I would ge
Hi,
since the change to the new list management, there has been
an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
bounces and that I would get removed from the list unless I
confirmed it (which I then did).
This has now ha
12 matches
Mail list logo
