On April 12, 2016 5:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>On 04/11/2016 05:30 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> Either way, when we split to
>> set (reg tmp) (high (const (minus ((symbol_ref) (reg 2)
>> .. mem (lo_sum (reg tmp) (const (minus ((symbol_ref) (reg 2)
>> both high and
On 04/11/2016 05:30 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
Either way, when we split to
set (reg tmp) (high (const (minus ((symbol_ref) (reg 2)
.. mem (lo_sum (reg tmp) (const (minus ((symbol_ref) (reg 2)
both high and lo_sum reference r2 and the linker could happily replace
rtmp in the lo
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 10:00 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:41:05PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 04/08/2016 11:10 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > > The first is an issue with TOC-relative addresses on PowerPC. These are
> > > symbolic addresses that are to be loaded fro
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:41:05PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 11:10 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > The first is an issue with TOC-relative addresses on PowerPC. These are
> > symbolic addresses that are to be loaded from a fixed slot in the table
> > of contents, as addressed by
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 13:41 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 11:10 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > The first is an issue with TOC-relative addresses on PowerPC. These are
> > symbolic addresses that are to be loaded from a fixed slot in the table
> > of contents, as addressed by the TOC
On 04/08/2016 11:10 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> The first is an issue with TOC-relative addresses on PowerPC. These are
> symbolic addresses that are to be loaded from a fixed slot in the table
> of contents, as addressed by the TOC pointer (r2). In the RTL phases
> prior to register allocation, th
On April 8, 2016 8:10:16 PM GMT+02:00, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I ran into a couple of aliasing issues with a project I'm working on,
>and have some questions.
>
>The first is an issue with TOC-relative addresses on PowerPC. These
>are
>symbolic addresses that are to be loaded from a fixed sl
