Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode

2005-02-28 Thread Phil Edwards
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Patrick McFarland wrote: > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 11:03 am, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > I though that #gcc on oftc.net was more active, anyway, or has this > > changed? > > This was more of a request for the #gcc on freenode to catch up with the r

Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode

2005-02-23 Thread Patrick McFarland
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 11:03 am, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Andrew Haley: > > Patrick McFarland writes: > > > Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step > > > away in a direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from > > > the FreeNode network. > > >

Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode

2005-02-23 Thread Patrick McFarland
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 06:58 am, Andrew Haley wrote: > Patrick McFarland writes: > > Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step > > away in a direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from > > the FreeNode network. > > I can't find a statement from

Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode

2005-02-23 Thread Florian Weimer
* Andrew Haley: > Patrick McFarland writes: > > Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step away > in a > > direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from the FreeNode > > network. > > I can't find a statement from FreeNode. There is one, but it's fair

Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode

2005-02-23 Thread Andrew Haley
Patrick McFarland writes: > Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step away in > a > direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from the FreeNode > network. I can't find a statement from FreeNode. This would be a more appropriate discussion for GNU, w