Re: Simplification of combine patterns with subreg and zero_extract

2006-04-14 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 01:29:13PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > What combine is doing is to expand compound operations such as > zero_extract, simplifying them, and try to make new compound operations. > Therefore you should first try to understand what's causing combine to > miss the simpl

Re: Simplification of combine patterns with subreg and zero_extract

2006-04-14 Thread Paolo Bonzini
I think it is simply because combine.c doesn't have any code to simplify this kind of expression. In theory it should have... However, if you add these simplifications to simplify-rtx.c, it will be picked up by combine. There is a lot of simplification code in combine.c too. Should I

Re: Simplification of combine patterns with subreg and zero_extract

2006-04-14 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:29:13 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote > > Also, is there a function for simplifying a zero_extract? > > What combine is doing is to expand compound operations such as > zero_extract, simplifying them, and try to make new compound > operations. Therefore you should first try t

Re: Simplification of combine patterns with subreg and zero_extract

2006-04-13 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Also, is there a function for simplifying a zero_extract? What combine is doing is to expand compound operations such as zero_extract, simplifying them, and try to make new compound operations. Therefore you should first try to understand what's causing combine to miss the simplification.