On 12 March 2014 15:13, lin zuojian wrote:
> Hi Chandler,
> I have looked into their "Machine Instr Scheduler", and find out
> that LLVM have not yet enable them by default.And further test find
> they are still not yet working.(e.g,-mtune=cortex-a9,a15,a53
> generates the same cod
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:30:28AM +0800, lin zuojian wrote:
> Hi Chandler,
> Thanks a lot for your answer.It is pretty misleading to find out
> that DAG has schedule unit.
> --
> Regards
> lin zuojian
Hi Chandler,
I have looked into their "Machine Instr Scheduler", and find out
th
Hi Chandler,
Thanks a lot for your answer.It is pretty misleading to find out
that DAG has schedule unit.
--
Regards
lin zuojian
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:33 PM, lin zuojian wrote:
> Hi,
> I just ask for opinions.I think many GCC developers do familiar with
> the opponent.If I ask in the LLVM mailing list, I have to worry
> about If they are familiar with GCC, too(what's sched2 pass?).
I suspect you will have t
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:11:43PM -0700, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, lin zuojian wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I read LLVM code for a while,and a question raise:Whose scheduler is
> > better?
> > LLVM brings in the DAG,and make it look important just like IR or
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, lin zuojian wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I read LLVM code for a while,and a question raise:Whose scheduler is
> better?
> LLVM brings in the DAG,and make it look important just like IR or
> MachineInst.But is that necessary?I don't see what kind of problem
>
