On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I think we started suggesting more maintainers / reviewers to the
> SC and the appointments will slowly tickle in.
As just has happened now. :-)
> So, I suggest you suggest Vlad as IRA maintainer to the SC, and I would
> support that suggestion. Ge
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> * ambiguity of the decision. What does RTL optimizers/RTL maintainer mean?
> Anything related to RTL, in my view. As much as possible, I would lean
> towards flexible definitions of maintenance boundaries. If we make them
> too inflexible, this will
On 06/28/2011 03:52 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
They are complicated, solving NP-problems in heuristic ways.
I totally trust that people like Eric or Richard would _not_ approve
changes to those heuristics without contacting you or others.
On the other hand, I would totally trust them to app
On 06/28/2011 09:15 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 11-06-28 09:02 , Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Bernd and Richard, I'd like thank you for generous support of me. But
the email was mostly not about my frustration. I raised several
questions relative to the decision:
* ambiguity of the decision. What d
On 06/28/2011 09:27 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
If RTL optimizers (in the email subject *RTL* maintainer) do not include
areas mentioned by me above, I have no objects.
In Richard case, I even could live with the bigger interpretation of
term 'RTL opti
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> If RTL optimizers (in the email subject *RTL* maintainer) do not include
> areas mentioned by me above, I have no objects.
>
> In Richard case, I even could live with the bigger interpretation of
> term 'RTL optimizers'.
Apologies for the imprecise c
On 11-06-28 09:02 , Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Bernd and Richard, I'd like thank you for generous support of me. But
the email was mostly not about my frustration. I raised several
questions relative to the decision:
* ambiguity of the decision. What does RTL optimizers/RTL maintainer mean?
Anyt
On 06/28/2011 08:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I think it's great that Richard was appointed. I also understand Vlad's
frustration and can't imagine why he isn't RA maintainer.
On 06/28/11 14:39, Richard Guenther wrote:
We discussed the m
On 11-06-28 08:51 , Richard Guenther wrote:
I think we started suggesting more maintainers / reviewers to the SC
and the appointments will slowly tickle in. If that works to our
satisfaction we do nothing (apart from proposing more people - the idea
was to broaden the area people can review pat
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I think it's great that Richard was appointed. I also understand Vlad's
> frustration and can't imagine why he isn't RA maintainer.
>
> On 06/28/11 14:39, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> We discussed the maintainer appointing process at the London
I think it's great that Richard was appointed. I also understand Vlad's
frustration and can't imagine why he isn't RA maintainer.
On 06/28/11 14:39, Richard Guenther wrote:
> We discussed the maintainer appointing process at the London GCC
> Gathering event, a summary can be looked up at the pdf a
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 06:39 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>
>> It's my pleasure to announce that, also based on the recommendation of
>> Eric Botcazou as the current maintainer in that area¹, the steering
>> committee is appointing Richard Sandiford
On 06/27/2011 06:39 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
It's my pleasure to announce that, also based on the recommendation of
Eric Botcazou as the current maintainer in that area¹, the steering
committee is appointing Richard Sandiford as an additional RTL optimizers
maintainer.
Please adjust the MAINTAI
13 matches
Mail list logo
