Hi Mark,
Thanks for the reply!
On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 13:23 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 09:29:03PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 21:55 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > I might be misinterpreting the issue you are seeing.
> > >
>
Hi Richard,
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 09:29:03PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 21:55 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I might be misinterpreting the issue you are seeing.
> >
> > But one problem with debuginfo/DWARF is that relative source paths
> > aren't clearly defined. If
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the reply.
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 21:55 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I added Sergio to the CC since he was looking at debuginfo/DWARF
> relative paths created by -fdebug-prefix-map in Debian and having trouble
> making them work correctly. Maybe he has some feedback how to mak
Hi Richard,
I added Sergio to the CC since he was looking at debuginfo/DWARF
relative paths created by -fdebug-prefix-map in Debian and having trouble
making them work correctly. Maybe he has some feedback how to make
this work.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Richard Purdie via Gcc wro
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 17:15 +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Richard Purdie via Gcc wrote:
>
> > Currently it works well for absolute paths but if a file uses a
> > relative path or a path with a symlink in, or a non-absolute path, it
> > will miss those cases. For relative paths
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Richard Purdie via Gcc wrote:
> Currently it works well for absolute paths but if a file uses a
> relative path or a path with a symlink in, or a non-absolute path, it
> will miss those cases. For relative paths in particular it is
> problematic as you can't easily construct a
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:28 AM Richard Purdie via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 12:13 +0100, Richard Purdie via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering if we'd be able to improve path handling in the -f*-
> > prefix-map compiler options to cover relative paths?
> >
> > Currently it works
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 12:13 +0100, Richard Purdie via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if we'd be able to improve path handling in the -f*-
> prefix-map compiler options to cover relative paths?
>
> Currently it works well for absolute paths but if a file uses a
> relative path or a path with a
