On 09/14/2015 02:14 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 13/09/15 20:19, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jeff Law:
On 09/13/2015 12:28 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Ajit Kumar Agarwal:
The replacement of malloc with alloca can be done on the following
analysis.
If the lifetime of an object does not stretc
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
The replacement of malloc with alloca can be done on the following analysis.
If the lifetime of an object does not stretch beyond the immediate scope. In
such cases the malloc can be replaced with alloca.
This increases the performance to a great
On 13/09/15 20:19, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jeff Law:
>
>> On 09/13/2015 12:28 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Ajit Kumar Agarwal:
>>>
The replacement of malloc with alloca can be done on the following
analysis.
If the lifetime of an object does not stretch beyond the immediat
* Jeff Law:
> On 09/13/2015 12:28 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Ajit Kumar Agarwal:
>>
>>> The replacement of malloc with alloca can be done on the following
>>> analysis.
>>>
>>> If the lifetime of an object does not stretch beyond the immediate
>>> scope. In such cases the malloc can be replace
On 09/13/2015 12:28 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Ajit Kumar Agarwal:
The replacement of malloc with alloca can be done on the following
analysis.
If the lifetime of an object does not stretch beyond the immediate
scope. In such cases the malloc can be replaced with alloca. This
increases the p
* Ajit Kumar Agarwal:
> The replacement of malloc with alloca can be done on the following
> analysis.
>
> If the lifetime of an object does not stretch beyond the immediate
> scope. In such cases the malloc can be replaced with alloca. This
> increases the performance to a great extent.
You als
