Steven Bosscher wrote:
On 4/12/07, Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An interesting observation is that the more hard registers the
processor
> has, the bigger slowdown is. Although it might be a coincidence.
Yes, I noticed
On 4/12/07, Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An interesting observation is that the more hard registers the processor
> has, the bigger slowdown is. Although it might be a coincidence.
Yes, I noticed this too. I don't believe
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An interesting observation is that the more hard registers the processor
has, the bigger slowdown is. Although it might be a coincidence.
Yes, I noticed this too. I don't believe this is a coincidence. It's
the first thing I was plannin
Steven Bosscher wrote:
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for testing this. Do you also have per benchmark compilation
> times, perhaps?
>
Not really. I don't do that because runtest startup is about 0.4s (on
ppc64) and a few fp tests are compiled for 1.5s. If y
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for testing this. Do you also have per benchmark compilation
> times, perhaps?
>
Not really. I don't do that because runtest startup is about 0.4s (on
ppc64) and a few fp tests are compiled for 1.5s. If you are interesting
in anal
Steven Bosscher wrote:
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SPECFp2000 compilation time (user time):
machine mainline branch change
-
x86_64 104.8s117.7s +12.3%
ppc64312.3s367.8s +17.8%
ia64 377.6s502.9s +33.2%
Hi
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SPECFp2000 compilation time (user time):
machine mainline branch change
-
x86_64 104.8s117.7s +12.3%
ppc64312.3s367.8s +17.8%
ia64 377.6s502.9s +33.2%
Hi Vlad,
Thanks for testing
