Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-13 Thread Diego Novillo
On 5/12/08 1:21 PM, David Daney wrote: For mipsel-linux: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-05/msg01055.html Thanks. The complete bootstrap/test cycle seems to be about 10% faster than on the trunk. I didn't try to figure out why, although I can speculate that it is due to the fac

Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-12 Thread David Daney
Diego Novillo wrote: The tuples branch is at the point now that it should bootstrap all primary languages and targets. There are things that are still broken and being worked on (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/tuples), but by and large things should Just Work. I expect things like code generation

Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-10 Thread Diego Novillo
On 5/9/08 4:32 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote: * config/sh/sh.c (sh_gimplify_va_arg_expr): Change pre_p and post_p types to gimple_seq *. Thanks. This is certainly OK. Diego.

Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-09 Thread Kaz Kojima
Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, for folks with free cycles to spare, could you build the branch on > your favourite target and report bugs? Bugzilla and/or email reports > are OK. If you are creating a bugzilla report, please add my address to > the CC field. With the attached

Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-08 Thread Aldy Hernandez
> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > are OK. If you are creating a bugzilla report, please add my address > to the CC field. Me too please. Aldy