This may be of interest to KDE developers. So adding them to the CC list.
Manuel.
On 5 April 2010 17:20, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
> compilers
On 5 April 2010 17:20, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Included are most of the outstanding bugzilla requests with the
> "diagnostic" keyword. However, I am looking for help! Please send me
> code samples that frustrate, obfuscate, and annoy.
Some PRs missing in this list:
986
13452
13657
15766
16663
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 12:02 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-clang-error-recovery.html
...As it happens, some C++ diagnostics are better than the
same diagnostic for C and viceversa.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Chris Lattn
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 12:02 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> > >> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-clang-error-recovery.html
> > >
> > > ...As it happens, some C++ diagnostics are better than the
> > > same diagnostic for C and viceversa.
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Chris L
> >> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-clang-error-recovery.html
> >
> > ...As it happens, some C++ diagnostics are better than the
> > same diagnostic for C and viceversa.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I think all the C examples are also valid C++
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> Hi Benjamin,
>>
>> I wrote a little blog post that shows off some of the things that Clang can
>> do. It would be great to improve some of GCC/G++'s diagnostics in a similar
>> way:
>>
>> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-cl
On 6 April 2010 18:00, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
>> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
>> compilers.
>>
>> Included are mo
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:00:16AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I wrote a little blog post that shows off some of the things that Clang can
> do. It would be great to improve some of GCC/G++'s diagnostics in a similar
> way:
>
> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-clang-error-recover
On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
> compilers.
>
> Included are most of the outstanding bugzilla requests with the
> "
On Apr 5, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>>
>> 5) There are a couple cases of GCC rejecting valid code (e.g. 19377),
>> or which there may be some debate about (19538) it might be worth
>> pointing this out. *shrug*
>
> One of the goals was to measure the output when the input is
> t
> 2) The clang invocations don't need -fcaret-diagnostics
> -fshow-source-location -fdiagnostics-fixit-info because they are the
> default.
>
> 3) It's best to not pass -fdiagnostics-print-source-range-info unless
> you're looking for machine interpretable output. This flag adds
> things like {3
> How to contribute? patches against the html? I see there are some
> examples without output. Also, it would be nicer if the page linked to
> each PR in bugzilla.
Well, the html is auto-generated so that isn't really the way to go.
Should I just check in the tests + xml into some gcc repository?
On 5 April 2010 17:20, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
> compilers.
Awesome!
How to contribute? patches against the html? I see there are some
examp
On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
> compilers.
>
> Included are most of the outstanding bugzilla requests with the
> "
14 matches
Mail list logo
