Joe Buck write:
>If the Windows version of GCC has to recognize __declspec to function
>as a hosted compiler on Windows, then the work already needs to be done
>to implement it.
Well, I'm kinda surprised that Windows verision of GCC recognizes
__declspec. The implementation is just a simple macro
On 03 April 2007 01:37, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 4/2/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I believe __declspec in Intel C++ compiler comes from:
>>
>> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dabb5z75.aspx
>
> How is Microsoft documentation, the real documentation for Intel C++
> compiler
On 4/2/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe __declspec in Intel C++ compiler comes from:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dabb5z75.aspx
How is Microsoft documentation, the real documentation for Intel C++
compiler? Have you seen the Cell language extension document [1]?
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:11:06PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 4/2/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If the Windows version of GCC has to recognize __declspec to function
> >as a hosted compiler on Windows, then the work already needs to be done
> >to implement it. So what's the harm
On 4/2/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the Windows version of GCC has to recognize __declspec to function
as a hosted compiler on Windows, then the work already needs to be done
to implement it. So what's the harm in allowing it on other platforms?
If it makes it easier for Windows pr
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:26:16PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 4/2/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 4/2/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I suspect I'd want this for x86 darwin as well.
> >
> >Why emulate Windows compilers on non windows machine? That is
On 4/2/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/2/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I suspect I'd want this for x86 darwin as well.
Why emulate Windows compilers on non windows machine? That is wrong.
GCC for Linux/Darwin/any other OS besides Windows is not a Windows
compil
On 4/2/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why emulate Windows compilers on non windows machine? That is wrong.
GCC for Linux/Darwin/any other OS besides Windows is not a Windows
compiler and should not act like one. If people want to port their
code, they should write their code to be
On 4/2/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suspect I'd want this for x86 darwin as well.
Why emulate Windows compilers on non windows machine? That is wrong.
GCC for Linux/Darwin/any other OS besides Windows is not a Windows
compiler and should not act like one. If people want to por
On Apr 2, 2007, at 2:03 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:
Many x86 SSE source codes use __declspec. I'd like to make
__declspec available for Linux/x86. We can do one of the
following:
1. Define TARGET_DECLSPEC for Linux/x86.
2. Define TARGET_DECLSPEC for x86.
3. Add -mdeclspec.
Any comments?
I suspect I'd
On 4/2/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It won't work with
__declspec(align(16)) double x [4];
And the code should be converted over to use GCC style attributes.
So really the code should be something like:
#ifndef __WIN32__
#define __align16 __attribute__((align(16) ))
#else
#define
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 02:06:15PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 4/2/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Many x86 SSE source codes use __declspec. I'd like to make
> >__declspec available for Linux/x86. We can do one of the
> >following:
>
> Do the following in the sources:
> #ifndef __W
On 4/2/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Many x86 SSE source codes use __declspec. I'd like to make
__declspec available for Linux/x86. We can do one of the
following:
Do the following in the sources:
#ifndef __WIN32__
#define __declspec(x)
#endif
or in the makefiles:
Add "-D__declspec(x
13 matches
Mail list logo
