On 4/13/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But this option isn't needed before.
This option should have been there anyways, I don't understand why the
option does not exist.
-- Pinski
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:13:34PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 4/13/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> On 4/13/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> You don't need to do all this, You can just use variable
On 4/13/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 4/13/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You don't need to do all this, You can just use variable with MASK
> which was added by JSM when PPC64-linux-gnu's target bits overf
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 4/13/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You don't need to do all this, You can just use variable with MASK
> which was added by JSM when PPC64-linux-gnu's target bits overflowed.
For i386, we are adding new target mask b
On 4/13/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You don't need to do all this, You can just use variable with MASK
which was added by JSM when PPC64-linux-gnu's target bits overflowed.
-- Pinski
