type_t * min_x;
> int i;
> struct type_t * data;
>
>[local count: 10737416]:
> data_10 = malloc (16);
> goto ; [100.00%]
>
>[local count: 1063004409]:
> _1 = _4 * 16;
> _2 = data_10 + _1;
> _3 = drand48 ();
> _2->x = _3;
> i_
goto ; [0.04%]
else
goto ; [99.96%]
[local count: 4295]:
__builtin_puts (&"min_x error"[0]);
exit (-1);
[local count: 10733121]:
_5 = min_x_12->x;
printf ("min_x %e\n", _5);
return 0;
}
Am I crazy?
Thanks,
Gary
_
A operand of that stmt.
Richard.
>Thanks,
>
>Gary
>
>From: Richard Biener
>Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 2:04 AM
>To: Gary Oblock
>Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: Questions regarding update_stmt and release_ssa_name_fn.
>
>[EXTER
then update that statement.
Thanks,
Gary
From: Richard Biener
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 2:04 AM
To: Gary Oblock
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Questions regarding update_stmt and release_ssa_name_fn.
[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an e
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:32 PM Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
>
> I'm having some major grief with a few related things that I'm try to
> do. The mostly revolve around trying to change the type of an SSA name
> (which I've given up in favor of creating new SSA names and replacing
> the ones I wanted
