On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 06:49:58AM -0700, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
> > Thanks, I didn't notice both functions have different arguments after
> > transformation.
> > However, gprof produces T.251 in its statistics, completely un
-Original Message-
> > From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 16 June 2009 14:02
> > To: Bingfeng Mei
> > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: Questionable function renaming
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Bingf
0.00 1 0.00 0.00 snocString
>
> Bingfeng
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 16 June 2009 14:02
>> To: Bingfeng Mei
>> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Questionable f
0.02 0.001 0.00 0.00 snocString
Bingfeng
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 June 2009 14:02
> To: Bingfeng Mei
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Questionable function renaming
>
> On
l Message-
>> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 16 June 2009 13:56
>> To: Bingfeng Mei
>> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Questionable function renaming
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Bingfeng
>> Mei wrote
Is it possible to restore the original name if the copy propagation is not
profitable and doesn't go ahead?
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 June 2009 13:56
> To: Bingfeng Mei
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Su
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I came across a function renaming issue in GCC 4.4.
>
> ~/work/install-x86/bin/gcc -Wall -Winline -O3 -g -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> -save-temps -c bzip2.c -fdump-tree-all
>
>
> Function saveInputFileMetaInfo is renamed to T.251 after
