On 21 May 2010, at 10:12, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Steven Bosscher > wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, IainS > wrote:
No Asbestos required - but .. I do have some observations..
I write pretty much all my serious (day-job) code in ObjC and..
... I have
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, IainS
> wrote:
>> No Asbestos required - but .. I do have some observations..
>>
>> I write pretty much all my serious (day-job) code in ObjC and..
>> ... I have stated that it's an intention to make *t
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 21:02 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The Obj-C++ front end is effectively unmaintained, and has virtually
>> no serious users. I propose to remove it from GCC.
>
> Maybe we could consider, for the
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, IainS wrote:
> No Asbestos required - but .. I do have some observations..
>
> I write pretty much all my serious (day-job) code in ObjC and..
> ... I have stated that it's an intention to make *that*, at least work at
> V2 on FSF.
>
> Having said that:
>
> a) I
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 21:02 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Obj-C++ front end is effectively unmaintained, and has virtually
> no serious users. I propose to remove it from GCC.
Maybe we could consider, for the putative people wanting to maintain
that frontend, to make it a plugin
No Asbestos required - but .. I do have some observations..
I write pretty much all my serious (day-job) code in ObjC and..
... I have stated that it's an intention to make *that*, at least
work at V2 on FSF.
Having said that:
a) I have not anything like as much attachment to ObjC++ ...
b
