Re: Problems with builtin setjmp receiver getting eliminated - Help

2008-03-23 Thread David Daney
Andrew Hutchinson wrote: > I have realised that part of the problem is that the receiver block > has no incoming edges so cfgcleanup removes it as unreachable block - > right? > > So any target that need a non trivial receiver for builtin_setjmp will > not work? That would mean any that have an o

Re: Problems with builtin setjmp receiver getting eliminated - Help

2008-03-23 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
I have realised that part of the problem is that the receiver block has no incoming edges so cfgcleanup removes it as unreachable block - right? So any target that need a non trivial receiver for builtin_setjmp will not work? That would mean any that have an offset between stack and pointers