On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:20 +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I think we are now in the position where we can merge the arm hard-vfp
> ABI code into trunk. There are no known issues with the compiler code
> and just one outstanding issue relating to tests and dealing with
> compiler variants (mult
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I think we are now in the position where we can merge the arm hard-vfp
> ABI code into trunk. There are no known issues with the compiler code
> and just one outstanding issue relating to tests and dealing with
> compiler variants (multilibs and other
From: Eric Botcazou
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:59:01 +0200
>> I believe that I could legitimately approve that patch myself (it's
>> pretty trivial and I didn't author it), but I'd prefer to get approval
>> from one of the SPARC maintainers. Here's your chance:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
> I believe that I could legitimately approve that patch myself (it's
> pretty trivial and I didn't author it), but I'd prefer to get approval
> from one of the SPARC maintainers. Here's your chance:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg01027.html
OK.
--
Eric Botcazou
