On 26 April 2010 16:33, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> I guess the conventional wisdom says that the way to attract new
> developers is to first attract users and testers and then turn them
> into contributors.
Unfortunately, this is not the case. We have probably hundreds of
thousands of users, people
Hi Manuel,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
>> I guess that's the point, really. 15 minutes for what exactly? All the
>> information is right there in the email Joakim sent. You are trying to
>> make life easier for developers, not users or testers.
>
> I think you misu
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/04/25 20:07:03:
>>
>> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
>>
>> > Noticed that gcc 4.3.4 doesn't optimize "add with carry" properly:
>
> BTW, I can see in gcc src:
> (define_insn ""
> [(set (match_operand:CC 0 "cc_reg_operand" "=x,?y")
> (c
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> Anyway, I *looked* at the page and it said something about gccbug so I tried
> that, not obvious either but I let me fire off a report an back came
> bug ID 43892
Thanks for filing the report.
Ian
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
>
> David Edelsohn wrote on 2010/04/26 14:54:55:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>> > Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 2010/04/26 13:59:04:
>> >> On 26 April 2010 09:13, Joakim Tjernlund
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 2010/04/26 15:29:54:
>
> On 26 April 2010 15:22, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> >
> >> feature enhancement. Some of the information can be left blank, but
> >> if we do not have information about the system and an example, we may
> >> not understand the request or may
On 26 April 2010 15:22, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
>> feature enhancement. Some of the information can be left blank, but
>> if we do not have information about the system and an example, we may
>> not understand the request or may not be able to reproduce the problem
>> and fix it.
>
> Just go lo
On 26 April 2010 14:42, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
What is to be done besides what you have done here but in a more
useful, structured manner? I am asking because we want to make things
simple but not simpler than they become
David Edelsohn wrote on 2010/04/26 14:54:55:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> > Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 2010/04/26 13:59:04:
> >> On 26 April 2010 09:13, Joakim Tjernlund
> >> wrote:
> >> > Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/04/25 20:07:03:
> >> >> Joakim Tje
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 2010/04/26 13:59:04:
>> On 26 April 2010 09:13, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>> > Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/04/25 20:07:03:
>> >> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Noticed that gcc 4.3.4 doesn't op
Hi David,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:45 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> There are a large number of users and a small number of developers.
> Why is it so large a burden to ask users to provide the information in
> a standard format in a centralized, trackable location, like GCC
> Bugzilla?
I'm not s
In Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
What is to be done besides what you have done here but in a more
useful, structured manner? I am asking because we want to make things
simple but not simpler than th
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
>>> What is to be done besides what you have done here but in a more
>>> useful, structured manner? I am asking because we want to make things
>>> simple but not simpler than they become more complex for us.
>>
>> Lots of stuff to read on
On 26 April 2010 14:21, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 2010/04/26 13:59:04:
>> On 26 April 2010 09:13, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>> > Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/04/25 20:07:03:
>> >> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Noticed that gcc 4.3.4 doesn't optimize "a
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 2010/04/26 13:59:04:
> On 26 April 2010 09:13, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> > Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/04/25 20:07:03:
> >> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> >>
> >> > Noticed that gcc 4.3.4 doesn't optimize "add with carry" properly:
> >>
> >> Please file a missed-o
On 26 April 2010 09:13, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/04/25 20:07:03:
>> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
>>
>> > Noticed that gcc 4.3.4 doesn't optimize "add with carry" properly:
>>
>> Please file a missed-optimization report according to
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ . Thank
Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/04/25 20:07:03:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
>
> > Noticed that gcc 4.3.4 doesn't optimize "add with carry" properly:
BTW, I can see in gcc src:
(define_insn ""
[(set (match_operand:CC 0 "cc_reg_operand" "=x,?y")
(compare:CC
(plus:SI (gt:SI (matc
Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/04/25 20:07:03:
> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
>
> > Noticed that gcc 4.3.4 doesn't optimize "add with carry" properly:
>
> Please file a missed-optimization report according to
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ . Thanks.
I rather not, going through all that just for one odd
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> Noticed that gcc 4.3.4 doesn't optimize "add with carry" properly:
Please file a missed-optimization report according to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ . Thanks.
Ian
19 matches
Mail list logo
