Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems like SItype would be sufficient everywhere, and I can't see
> any obvious reason it would be slower.
What about 16-bit targets?
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:07:32PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
I belive that by changing mentioned typedef line of soft-fp.h into
#ifndef CMPtype
#define CMPtype int
#endif
would satisfy everybody. Is this acceptable for glibc?
Yes.
Though, please use CMPty
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:07:32PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I belive that by changing mentioned typedef line of soft-fp.h into
>
> #ifndef CMPtype
> #define CMPtype int
> #endif
>
> would satisfy everybody. Is this acceptable for glibc?
Yes.
Though, please use CMPtype not only for ret
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:07:32PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > It can hardly be considered a glibc bug when GCC changed this incompatibly
> > a year ago, up to GCC 4.1.x inclusive __eqtf2 etc. used SItype (i.e. int on
> > all architectures glibc cares about).
> >
> > That said, as none of the rou
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:36:46AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
The FSF has objected in the past to any discussions of forking glibc. RMS
would (I believe) argue that what you're talking about is a glibc bug and
glibc should fix it, we shouldn't fork the routine to work around
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:36:46AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> The FSF has objected in the past to any discussions of forking glibc. RMS
> would (I believe) argue that what you're talking about is a glibc bug and
> glibc should fix it, we shouldn't fork the routine to work around it.
It can hardly b
On 6/14/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> There was no response from libc maintainers about changing the type of
> soft-fp compares into CMPtype. This type should be defined to mode(word)
> or at least we should be able to redef
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> There was no response from libc maintainers about changing the type of
> soft-fp compares into CMPtype. This type should be defined to mode(word)
> or at least we should be able to redefine it outside the soft-fp, in
> target depende
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> There was no response from libc maintainers about changing the type of soft-fp
> compares into CMPtype. This type should be defined to mode(word) or at least
Take that matter with the glibc maintainers directly to RMS.
> we should be able to redefine it
