On 12/15/2012 07:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I did test i386-rtems in the past few months but it had a build breakage and I
filed a PR. That issue was resolved but at that point about 1/4 of the rtems
targets failed to compile.
You likely are referring to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
I am on travel and answering from my phone so don't remember all the exact
dates and PRs.
I did test i386-rtems in the past few months but it had a build breakage and I
filed a PR. That issue was resolved but at that point about 1/4 of the rtems
targets failed to compile. I filed PRs but didn't
On 12/15/2012 12:32 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the fast response!
So to keep an architecture supported by GCC, we would need to:
Three or more times a year preferably either during OR after
"stage3"
1. use the SVN version of gcc, 2. patch with an RTEMS patch, 3. use
./contrib/te
Hi,
Thanks for the fast response!
So to keep an architecture supported by GCC, we would need to:
Three or more times a year preferably either during OR after "stage3"
1. use the SVN version of gcc,
2. patch with an RTEMS patch,
3. use ./contrib/test_summary and pipe the output to a shell.
4.
On 12/15/2012 12:42 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
If you want a port to be live show that it is live by posting regular
testresults to gcc-testresults.
Not all of this world is Linux nor backed by large teams at
companies :) We simply do not have the resources do to this.
But that's the poi
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Ralf Corsepius
wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 10:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/14/2012 3:13 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote:
Hi,
RTEMS still supports the i386, and there are many i38
On 12/14/2012 10:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
On 12/14/2012 3:13 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote:
Hi,
RTEMS still supports the i386, and there are many i386 machines still
in use. Deprecating the i386 will negatively impact RTEMS ability to
supp
On 12/14/2012 09:16 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
On 12/14/2012 3:13 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote:
Hi,
RTEMS still supports the i386, and there are many i386 machines still
in use. Deprecating the i386 will negatively impact RTEMS ability to
support the i386. As Steven Bosscher said, the "benefits" are
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 3:13 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> RTEMS still supports the i386, and there are many i386 machines still
>> in use. Deprecating the i386 will negatively impact RTEMS ability to
>> support the i386. As Steven Bossche
Having read this whole thread, Ivote for deprecating the 386.
People using this ancient architecture can perfectly well use
older versions of gcc that have this support.
On 12/14/2012 3:13 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote:
Hi,
RTEMS still supports the i386, and there are many i386 machines still
in use. Deprecating the i386 will negatively impact RTEMS ability to
support the i386. As Steven Bosscher said, the "benefits" are small,
and the impact would be serious for R
11 matches
Mail list logo
