On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:54 PM GT wrote:
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:20 PM, GT wrote:
>
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Thursday, January 9, 2020 8:42 AM, Richard Biener
> > richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > As for the other qu
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:20 PM, GT wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Thursday, January 9, 2020 8:42 AM, Richard Biener
> richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > As for the other question for testing you probably want to provide a
> > OMP si
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, January 9, 2020 8:42 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> As for the other question for testing you probably want to provide a
> OMP simd declaration
> of a function like
>
> _Complex double mycexpi (double);
>
> and make a testcase like
>
> void foo (_Comp
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 9:01 PM GT wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, December 9, 2019 3:39 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> > > I'm modifying the code trying to get complex double accepted as a valid
> > > type by the vectorizer.
> > > This is the first time I'm dealing wi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 9, 2019 3:39 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> > I'm modifying the code trying to get complex double accepted as a valid
> > type by the vectorizer.
> > This is the first time I'm dealing with GCC source so I ask for some
> > patience.
> > Functio
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 9, 2019 3:39 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> You don't want to do it this way but map _Complex double to a vector
> of 2 * n doubles instead.
> Look into get_related_vectype_for_scalar_type where it alreday has
> code to "change" the
> scalar type
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 9, 2019 12:36 PM, GT wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, December 9, 2019 3:39 AM, Richard Biener
> richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > I'm modifying the code trying to get complex double accepted as a valid
> > > typ
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 9, 2019 3:39 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
> > I'm modifying the code trying to get complex double accepted as a valid
> > type by the vectorizer.
> > This is the first time I'm dealing with GCC source so I ask for some
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 10:40 PM GT wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Friday, December 6, 2019 12:43 PM, Richard Biener
> richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> ...
> ...
>
> > > Are we certain the change we want is to support _Complex double so that
> > > cexpi is auto-vectorized?
>
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, December 6, 2019 12:43 PM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
...
> > Are we certain the change we want is to support _Complex double so that
> > cexpi is auto-vectorized?
> > Looking at the resulting executable of the code with sinco
On December 6, 2019 5:50:25 PM GMT+01:00, GT wrote:
>‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>On Friday, December 6, 2019 6:38 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 12:15 PM Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:48:03AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, December 6, 2019 6:38 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 12:15 PM Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:48:03AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > So I used
> > > void sincos(double x, double *sin, d
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 12:15 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:48:03AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > So I used
> >
> > void sincos(double x, double *sin, double *cos);
> > _Complex double __attribute__((__simd__("notinbranch")))
> > __builtin_cexpi (double);
>
> While Intel
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:48:03AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> So I used
>
> void sincos(double x, double *sin, double *cos);
> _Complex double __attribute__((__simd__("notinbranch")))
> __builtin_cexpi (double);
While Intel-ABI-Vector-Function-2015-v0.9.8.pdf talks about complex numbers,
the
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 6:45 PM GT wrote:
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Thursday, December 5, 2019 4:44 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> ...
> ...
> ...
>
> > >
> > > I'm trying to identify the source code which needs modification but I
> > > need help proceeding.
> > > I am compari
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, December 5, 2019 4:44 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
...
...
...
> >
> > I'm trying to identify the source code which needs modification but I need
> > help proceeding.
> > I am comparing two compilations: The first is a simple file with a call to
>
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:53 PM GT wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, November 27, 2019 3:19 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Questions:
> > >
> > > 1. Should we aim to provide a vectorized version of __builtin_cexpi? If
> > > so, it would have
> > > to b
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 27, 2019 3:19 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
...
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1. Should we aim to provide a vectorized version of __builtin_cexpi? If
> > so, it would have
> > to be a PPC64-only vector __builtin-cexpi, right?
> >
> > 2. Or sho
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:53 PM GT wrote:
>
> > >
> > > i wonder if gcc can auto-vectorize scalar sincos
> > > calls, the vectorizer seems to want the calls to
> > > have no side-effect, but attribute pure or const
> > > is not appropriate for sincos (which has no return
> > > value but takes writ
> >
> > i wonder if gcc can auto-vectorize scalar sincos
> > calls, the vectorizer seems to want the calls to
> > have no side-effect, but attribute pure or const
> > is not appropriate for sincos (which has no return
> > value but takes writable pointer args)
>
> We have __builtin_cexpi for that b
On September 30, 2019 3:52:52 PM GMT+02:00, Szabolcs Nagy
wrote:
>On 27/09/2019 20:23, GT wrote:
>> I am attempting to create a vector version of sincos for PPC64.
>> The relevant discussion thread is on the GLIBC libc-alpha mailing
>list.
>> Navigate it beginning at
>https://sourceware.org/ml/li
On 30/09/2019 18:30, GT wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, September 30, 2019 9:52 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
> wrote:
>
>> On 27/09/2019 20:23, GT wrote:
>>
>>> I am attempting to create a vector version of sincos for PPC64.
>>> The relevant discussion thread is on the GLIBC libc-alp
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 30, 2019 9:52 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
wrote:
> On 27/09/2019 20:23, GT wrote:
>
> > I am attempting to create a vector version of sincos for PPC64.
> > The relevant discussion thread is on the GLIBC libc-alpha mailing list.
> > Navigate it beginnin
On 27/09/2019 20:23, GT wrote:
> I am attempting to create a vector version of sincos for PPC64.
> The relevant discussion thread is on the GLIBC libc-alpha mailing list.
> Navigate it beginning at
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-09/msg00334.html
>
> The intention is to reuse as much
24 matches
Mail list logo
