"Peng Yu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I should have said in reply to your last message: this is the wrong
mailing list for this question. Please take any followups to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
> Isn't ANSI C++ a subset of POSIX C++. Why do I need to specify
> _POSIX_SOURCE, _POSIX_C_SOURCE and
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Peng Yu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> There is an options -ansi to make g++ ANSI compatible. I'm wondering
>> if there is an option to make g++ POSIX compatible. Or g++ is already
>> POSIX compatible without an opti
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Peng Yu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> There is an options -ansi to make g++ ANSI compatible. I'm wondering
>> if there is an option to make g++ POSIX compatible. Or g++ is already
>> POSIX compatible without an opti
"Peng Yu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is an options -ansi to make g++ ANSI compatible. I'm wondering
> if there is an option to make g++ POSIX compatible. Or g++ is already
> POSIX compatible without an option?
POSIX itself specifies features macros which you may define to compile
your so
