On 06/19/2011 04:26 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jack Howarth writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>> For PCH what matters is not whether gcc defaults to generating PIE, but
>>> whether gcc itself is compiled as a PIE. In general I believe that a
>
Jack Howarth writes:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> For PCH what matters is not whether gcc defaults to generating PIE, but
>> whether gcc itself is compiled as a PIE. In general I believe that a
>> PIE gcc will not support PCH--it will work most of th
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jack Howarth writes:
>
> > What is the current state of supporting hardened operating systems
> > that default to -fpie/-fPIE/-pie in gcc trunk? Do those releases still use
> > their own patches for gcc or has all of those ch
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jack Howarth writes:
>
> > What is the current state of supporting hardened operating systems
> > that default to -fpie/-fPIE/-pie in gcc trunk? Do those releases still use
> > their own patches for gcc or has all of those ch
Jack Howarth writes:
> What is the current state of supporting hardened operating systems
> that default to -fpie/-fPIE/-pie in gcc trunk? Do those releases still use
> their own patches for gcc or has all of those changes been committed to gcc
> trunk?
> If so, does anyone recall the specif
