On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:12:30AM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
> That's a very nice offer. I think the idea of an automated patch
> boostrap & regtester is of much interest, and i can volunteer to set up
> the systems (if need be, i can move to the machines since i live in Paris).
>
> Furthermore,
That's a very nice offer. I think the idea of an automated patch
boostrap & regtester is of much interest, and i can volunteer to set up
the systems (if need be, i can move to the machines since i live in Paris).
Furthermore, it would be interesting if we could install, on some of
those, a rat
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> >
> > So I'm asking for project proposals, that is to say people that think
> > that their volunteer time to work on these old machine (scripts,
> > compiling, ... under the limit of minimal external bandwidth use) is of
> > some si
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 20:11 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 08:53 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > Looks good. I think it would be slightly more secure to have people
> > > commit the patch with a unique name in some access-controlled CVS
> > > (either some subdir of the GCC o
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 08:53 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Looks good. I think it would be slightly more secure to have people
> > commit the patch with a unique name in some access-controlled CVS
> > (either some subdir of the GCC one or a new local one) than relying on
> > email "From" fields at
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 12:54 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:02 +0200, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > I'm proposing to automate gcc's bootstrap & regtest: for each mail
> > sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], if 'From' is in gcc-developpers and 'body'
> > contains a patch against some branc
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Looks good. I think it would be slightly more secure to have people
> commit the patch with a unique name in some access-controlled CVS
> (either some subdir of the GCC one or a new local one) than relying on
> email "From" fields at the cost of minor inconvenience.
>
We a
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:02 +0200, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> I'm proposing to automate gcc's bootstrap & regtest: for each mail
> sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], if 'From' is in gcc-developpers and 'body'
> contains a patch against some branch (ie. if it fails to apply to a
> branch, just drop it and warn
Hi Laurent,
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> So I'm asking for project proposals, that is to say people that think
> that their volunteer time to work on these old machine (scripts,
> compiling, ... under the limit of minimal external bandwidth use) is of
> some significant benefit to some free softwar
