"Benjamin Kosnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've been waiting to revisit this issue until we have correct
| alignment support for template objects (std::aligned_storage, etc.)
| in g++. Then, we can use array_allocator to deal with this stuff in a
| much more transparent and C++ friendly way.
The "current" situation was "the best" compromise we arrived at in the
very old days of GCC-3.x.x -- see the archive for discussions.
Indeed. I would resist change just for change's sake, especially when
we have not seen a detailed bug report filed.
I'd suspect that nowadays we have better way
Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Michael Veksler wrote:
|
| > What do you think?
|
| I think that the "current" solution is very, very old, and "heaven"
| knows how many others didn't work at the time on some "exotic"
| platforms. I would suggest filing a PR and CCing Benjamin.
The "
Michael Veksler wrote:
> >What do you think?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:58:50PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> I think that the "current" solution is very, very old, and "heaven"
> knows how many others didn't work at the time on some "exotic"
> platforms. I would suggest filing a PR and CCing B
Michael Veksler wrote:
What do you think?
I think that the "current" solution is very, very old, and "heaven"
knows how many others didn't work at the time on some "exotic"
platforms. I would suggest filing a PR and CCing Benjamin.
Thanks,
Paolo.
