On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 08:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:52:27PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I'm not yet familiar with the details of the gcc GC, but it appears that
> > GTY() annotations are preprocessed to generate traversal code used by a
> > mark-and-swe
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:19:17 +0200
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> You could just:
> #include "ggc.h"
>
> static void my_walker (void *arg ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> {
> /* Ignore argument, as it is dummy */
> /* Walk all the still live python objects here and if they reference
> GCC GC objects, call
>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> I've been working on a new plugin for GCC, which supports embedding
> Python within GCC, exposing GCC's internal data structures as Python
> objects and classes.
>
> The plugin links against libpython, and (I hope) allows you to invoke
> arbi
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:51:52 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
>
> FWIW, I think I disagree with some of the above. For me, one of the
> core "ideas" behind python is that syntax matters a great deal - code is
> read more times than it's written, so the readability of code to humans
> is important. Wh
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:31 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:51 -0400
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > When I mentioned the garbage collector, I was merely trying to convey
> > the early, buggy nature of my code. This is a bug that I need to fix,
> > but not a fundamental
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:30 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:51 -0400
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > I'm aware of MELT - as I understand it, it's a Lisp variant.
>
> Yes. However, I do have in the works an infix syntax of MELT called
> MILT. But it would just be an infix
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:51 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> When I mentioned the garbage collector, I was merely trying to convey
> the early, buggy nature of my code. This is a bug that I need to fix,
> but not a fundamental design flaw (I hope!)
I would be very interested in understanding in de
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:51 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> I'm aware of MELT - as I understand it, it's a Lisp variant.
Yes. However, I do have in the works an infix syntax of MELT called
MILT. But it would just be an infix/prefix syntax of exactly the same
language (more precisely, of a large sub
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 21:02 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:33:20 -0400
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > It's still at the "experimental proof-of-concept stage"; expect crashes
> > and tracebacks (I'm new to the insides of GCC, and I may have
> > misunderstood things. I'm en
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:33:20 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> It's still at the "experimental proof-of-concept stage"; expect crashes
> and tracebacks (I'm new to the insides of GCC, and I may have
> misunderstood things. I'm entirely ignoring the garbage collector, and
> I've also used a few entrypo
10 matches
Mail list logo
