> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:47:16 -0700
> From: "=?EUC-KR?B?U2VvbmdiYWUgUGFyayAoudq8urnoLCDa0+D328Yp?=" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> This little patch:
> [...]
> should fix the problem (thanks to Ian Lance Talyor and Andrew
> Pinski for helping me debug the problem on IRC). I've started
> the bootstr
Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) wrote:
> This little patch:
>
> diff -r 9e2b1e62931a gcc/combine.c
> --- a/gcc/combine.c Wed Jun 06 23:08:38 2007 +
> +++ b/gcc/combine.c Mon Jun 11 05:39:25 2007 +
> @@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@ subst (rtx x, rtx from, rtx to, int in_d
>
> So force this insn not to match
This little patch:
diff -r 9e2b1e62931a gcc/combine.c
--- a/gcc/combine.c Wed Jun 06 23:08:38 2007 +
+++ b/gcc/combine.c Mon Jun 11 05:39:25 2007 +
@@ -4237,7 +4237,7 @@ subst (rtx x, rtx from, rtx to, int in_d
So force this insn not to match in this (rare) case. */
if (!
Thanks for the detailed instruction on how to reproduce it
- I have successfully reproduced the problem, and narrowed it down
to combine that's deleting the insn in question.
Hopefully I'll be able to figure out what's wrong soon.
Seongbae
On 6/10/07, Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
