Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | AFAICT (at least according to mail logs, etc) you are the only user of | > | > apparently, you've to count properly. | | gccbug is different from what you are using. OK. -- Gaby

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Rainer Orth
Daniel Berlin writes: > Fixed. Indeed: a new resubmission just worked, thanks. > Perl syntax is weird enough that when people update it, they sometimes > add compile errors by accident, so the script doesn't even run enough to > be able to issue an error message :(. True enough: perl can easily

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:52 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | AFAICT (at least according to mail logs, etc) you are the only user of > > apparently, you've to count properly. What? You do read what i wrote, right? I said you appear to be the only us

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Andrew Pinski
> > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | AFAICT (at least according to mail logs, etc) you are the only user of > > apparently, you've to count properly. gccbug is different from what you are using. -- Pinski

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | AFAICT (at least according to mail logs, etc) you are the only user of apparently, you've to count properly.

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 11:23 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > Daniel Berlin writes: > > > > Could you please check what's going on there? Is this a general problem > > > with gcc-gnats processing or a problem parsing that particular message? > > > > Dunno. Grepping mail logs older than an hour takes

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 13:24 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Rainer Orth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > | I'm using gccbug since it provides the complete template where I just need > | to fill in the beef of the report. All I care for is the ability to handle > | bugs completely by em

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Rainer Orth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | I'm using gccbug since it provides the complete template where I just need | to fill in the beef of the report. All I care for is the ability to handle | bugs completely by email. Amen. And it is important that one has at least a good flexibility

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-12 Thread Rainer Orth
Daniel Berlin writes: > > Could you please check what's going on there? Is this a general problem > > with gcc-gnats processing or a problem parsing that particular message? > > Dunno. Grepping mail logs older than an hour takes a while on > sourceware, because they are large. Can you resend i

Re: Lost gccbug submission

2005-08-11 Thread Daniel Berlin
Could you please check what's going on there? Is this a general problem with gcc-gnats processing or a problem parsing that particular message? Dunno. Grepping mail logs older than an hour takes a while on sourceware, because they are large. Can you resend it and notify me when you do? gc