Re: Loop peeling

2014-10-29 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Evandro Menezes > wrote: > > While doing some benchmark flag mining on AArch64, I noticed that > > -fpeel-loops was a mined option often. As a matter of fact, when using it > > always, even without FDO, it seemed to raise most benchmarks and to leave > > almost

Re: Loop peeling

2014-10-29 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Tejas Belagod wrote: > > On 29/10/14 09:32, Richard Biener wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Evandro Menezes > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> While doing some benchmark flag mining on AArch64, I noticed that > >>> -fpeel-loops was a mined option often.

Re: Loop peeling

2014-10-29 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Tejas Belagod wrote: > On 29/10/14 09:32, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Evandro Menezes >> wrote: >>> >>> While doing some benchmark flag mining on AArch64, I noticed that >>> -fpeel-loops was a mined option often. As a matter of f

Re: Loop peeling

2014-10-29 Thread Tejas Belagod
On 29/10/14 09:32, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Evandro Menezes wrote: While doing some benchmark flag mining on AArch64, I noticed that -fpeel-loops was a mined option often. As a matter of fact, when using it always, even without FDO, it seemed to raise most benchma

Re: Loop peeling

2014-10-29 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Evandro Menezes wrote: > While doing some benchmark flag mining on AArch64, I noticed that > -fpeel-loops was a mined option often. As a matter of fact, when using it > always, even without FDO, it seemed to raise most benchmarks and to leave > almost all of the r