Re: gnu-gabi group (Was: Re: Linux-abi group)

2016-02-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: > On 11-Feb-2016 10:08 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > I think that none of the ABI extensions in question are anything to do > > with Linux, the kernel. Rather, they are ABI extensions for userspace in > > the GNU system, which apply the same under mult

Re: gnu-gabi group (Was: Re: Linux-abi group)

2016-02-14 Thread Suprateeka R Hegde
On 11-Feb-2016 09:55 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: On 11-Feb-2016 07:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: H.J, I think we are fragmenting with too many standards and mailing lists. This new discuss

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-11 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:50:29AM -0500, Ed Maste via llvm-commits wrote: > On 8 February 2016 at 18:08, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > >> >> I was referring to program properties: > >> >> > >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/fyIXttIsYc8 >

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-11 Thread anonymous
H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: On 11-Feb-2016 07:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: H.J, I think we are fragmenting with too many standards and mailing lists. This new discussion group and eventually th

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-11 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: > H.J, > > I think we are fragmenting with too many standards and mailing lists. This new > discussion group and eventually the resulting standards, all might be put > under LSB http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/lsb.shtml > > The Intro on LSB says

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-11 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: > On 11-Feb-2016 07:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde >> wrote: >>> >>> H.J, >>> >>> I think we are fragmenting with too many standards and mailing lists. >>> This >>> new discussion group and

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-11 Thread Suprateeka R Hegde
On 11-Feb-2016 07:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: H.J, I think we are fragmenting with too many standards and mailing lists. This new discussion group and eventually the resulting standards, all might be put under LSB http://refspecs.linuxfounda

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-11 Thread Ed Maste
On 8 February 2016 at 18:08, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> >> I was referring to program properties: >> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/fyIXttIsYc8 >> > >> > This looks more like an ELF topic to me, not really ABI. >> > >> > Please discu

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-11 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Suprateeka R Hegde wrote: > H.J, > > I think we are fragmenting with too many standards and mailing lists. This > new discussion group and eventually the resulting standards, all might be > put under LSB http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/lsb.shtml > > The Intro o

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-11 Thread Suprateeka R Hegde
H.J, I think we are fragmenting with too many standards and mailing lists. This new discussion group and eventually the resulting standards, all might be put under LSB http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/lsb.shtml The Intro on LSB says: http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_5.0.0/LSB-Core-

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-08 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> >> I was referring to program properties: >> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/fyIXttIsYc8 >> > >> > This looks more like an ELF topic to me, not really ABI. >> > >> > Please di

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-08 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> I was referring to program properties: > >> > >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/fyIXttIsYc8 > > > > This looks more like an ELF topic to me, not really ABI. > > > > Please discuss this on a GNU project list because it affects the > > ent

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-08 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * H. J. Lu: > >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> * H. J. Lu: >>> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent modification and extension of generic System V Application Binar

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* H. J. Lu: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * H. J. Lu: >> >>> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent >>> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface: >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-08 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * H.J. Lu [2016-02-08 11:24:53 -0800]: >> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent >> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface: >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-08 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * H. J. Lu: > >> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent >> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface: >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi >> >> I will start t

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-08 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* H.J. Lu [2016-02-08 11:24:53 -0800]: > I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent > modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface: > > https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi > > I will start to document existing Linux extensions

Re: Linux-abi group

2016-02-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* H. J. Lu: > I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent > modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface: > > https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi > > I will start to document existing Linux extensions, like STT_GNU_IFUNC. > I wil