Hi Steve,
PR 51751 seems to concern only complex*16 failures. Have
you had a chance to look at the real and double precision
errors?
That PR is in a different category, because input values to a BLAS
routine are wrong. I suspect an error in the testing (relying
on uninitialized memory), but
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:34:41PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have set up a semi-automatic lapack tester on
> powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc110 on the gcc compile farm).
> It downloads the current trunk, compiles it, then uses that
> compiler to compile the reference BLAS and Lap
