Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency

2010-10-17 Thread Dave Korn
On 17/10/2010 19:21, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> On 16/10/2010 21:20, Dave Korn wrote: > >> LTO symtab entries to be transformed by ASM_OUTPUT_LABELREF, are they >> intended to be assembler-level symbols, or are they supposed to be >> C-level symbols? > > Hmm, yes, whatever mangling happens in real sy

Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency

2010-10-17 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On 16/10/2010 21:20, Dave Korn wrote: > > >> U _libintl_bindtextdomain > >> U _libintl_gettext > >> U _libintl_textdomain > > >> 0070 9600 5f6c 6962696e 746c5f74 .._libintl_t > >> 0080 65787464 6f6d6169 6e02 extdomain... > >> 0090 000

Re: LTO symtabs inconsistency

2010-10-16 Thread Dave Korn
On 16/10/2010 21:20, Dave Korn wrote: >> U _libintl_bindtextdomain >> U _libintl_gettext >> U _libintl_textdomain >> 0070 9600 5f6c 6962696e 746c5f74 .._libintl_t >> 0080 65787464 6f6d6169 6e02 extdomain... >> 0090 00a6 005