On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> Both Fedora 19 and 20 have the patch needed for this to work. Hmm, I
> suppose the other thing necessary is a gcc that implements
> LDPT_GET_SYMBOLS_V2. You may be lacking that. Here's what I see with
> mainline gcc and ld.
It's been a while
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 08:18:06PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > What version linker? In particular, do you have the fix for PR12975?
>
> The Fedora 19 version. I think it hasn't changed since then which
> means it is 2.23.88.0.1-13 (from
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> What version linker? In particular, do you have the fix for PR12975?
The Fedora 19 version. I think it hasn't changed since then which
means it is 2.23.88.0.1-13 (from the RPM version number). No idea
whether that fix is included and unfortu
> What version linker? In particular, do you have the fix for PR12975?
It seems to work with gold and the LLVM plugin. I have added a test to
make sure it stays that way:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140804/229493.html
Cheers,
Rafael
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:04:17AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > Using LTO to create a DSO works fine (i.e., it performs the expected
> > optimizations) for symbols which are marked with visibility
> > attributes. It does not work, thoug
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Using LTO to create a DSO works fine (i.e., it performs the expected
> optimizations) for symbols which are marked with visibility
> attributes. It does not work, though, when the symbol is not
> restricted in its visibility in the source f
