On May 30, 2023, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:16 -0300, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc wrote:
>> On May 17, 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>>
>> > ISTR Alexandre Oliva (CC added) mentioning leveraging GDB to
>> > implement various bits of LSP functionality, such as handling
>> > multiple
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:16 -0300, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc wrote:
> On May 17, 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>
> > ISTR Alexandre Oliva (CC added) mentioning leveraging GDB to
> > implement various bits of LSP functionality, such as handling
> > multiple TUs.
>
> I recall advancing that suggestio
On May 17, 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> ISTR Alexandre Oliva (CC added) mentioning leveraging GDB to implement
> various bits of LSP functionality, such as handling multiple TUs. This
> sounds like a good idea to me (at least at a high level), as it could
> lead to the hypothetical GNU toolcha
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 10:52 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> PCH files can "be ignored" in some sense because they can be
> recalculated from `#include` files pretty easily. Module files,
> however, cannot.
This makes it even more important that there be a GCC-based LSP server,
if a Clang-based one can
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:25:04 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 18:38 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > FWIW, this is only going to get worse with C++ modules.
>
> There's no reason it should. Of course the right answer is to tell
> people to fix their build systems and if they want
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:47 AM David Malcolm via Gcc
wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 17:28 +0300, Eli Zaretskii via Gcc wrote:
> > Dear GCC developers,
>
> [CCing Frank, re the systemtap LSP implementation]
>
> Hi Eli
>
> > Emacs 29, to be released soon, will come with a built-in client for
> >
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 18:38 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > egregious example I'm aware of is that they look for GCC-named
> > precompiled headers (.gch), even though the Clang PCH format is
> > completely different. So if Clang (and the LSP servers built on
> > it) find a .gch header file they will
David Malcolm writes:
> [...snip...]
> I wrote that prototype, but I haven't touched it since 2017, and I
> already have more than enough other work, alas. I'm happy to help if
> someone wants to pick up the work and finish it.
>
> That patch kit did several things:
> (a) adds a new "on the sid
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 15:48:09 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> More frustratingly, Clang has made some poor decisions around
> "compatibility": they tried to leverage the GNU ecosystem by emulating
> GCC features and arguments but sometimes break things. The most
Alas, the cost of trying to make a c
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 17:28 +0300, Eli Zaretskii via Gcc wrote:
> If there are no current plans for implementing LSP, I hope someone
> will work on that soon, given that Emacs can now use it, and because
> having a GCC-based LSP implementation will allow people to use their
> installed GCC as the b
10 matches
Mail list logo
