Re: Java on uClinux (was: Null pointer check elimination)

2005-11-15 Thread Andrew Haley
Tom Tromey writes: > > "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bernd> Speaking of which, has anyone ported gcj to a MMU-less uClinux > Bernd> platform yet? > > Andrew> It's impossible with the current config. This is because some of > Andrew> libgcj is written on C++,

Re: Java on uClinux (was: Null pointer check elimination)

2005-11-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bernd> Speaking of which, has anyone ported gcj to a MMU-less uClinux Bernd> platform yet? Andrew> It's impossible with the current config. This is because some of Andrew> libgcj is written on C++, and the C++ compiler FE does not insert

Re: Java on uClinux (was: Null pointer check elimination)

2005-11-15 Thread Andrew Haley
Bernd Schmidt writes: > David Daney wrote: > > Perhaps not in general, but one unstated premise of this whole thread is > > that for some GCC targets (most Unix like operating systems) you *can* > > count on a SIGSEGV when you dereference a null pointer. The java front > > end takes advant