On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Segher Boessenkool:
>
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:49:21AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> > We already have an option for that
> >> > (-Werror=implicit-function-declaration),
> >> > and it is an error by
On 04/07/2019 12:27, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Implicit function declarations were removed from C99, more than twenty
> years ago. So far, GCC only warns about them because there were too
> many old configure scripts where an error would lead to incorrect
> configure check failures.
>
> I can try t
* Segher Boessenkool:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:49:21AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > We already have an option for that (-Werror=implicit-function-declaration),
>> > and it is an error by default with -pedantic-errors already. If you are
>> > asking to make it an error by
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:49:21AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > We already have an option for that (-Werror=implicit-function-declaration),
> > and it is an error by default with -pedantic-errors already. If you are
> > asking to make it an error by default, I second that; there n
* Segher Boessenkool:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Implicit function declarations were removed from C99, more than twenty
>> years ago. So far, GCC only warns about them because there were too
>> many old configure scripts where an error would lead to incor
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Implicit function declarations were removed from C99, more than twenty
> years ago. So far, GCC only warns about them because there were too
> many old configure scripts where an error would lead to incorrect
> configure check failu
