Re: IPA branch

2006-10-05 Thread Razya Ladelsky
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2006 01:55:24: > Razya Ladelsky wrote: > > > Except for new optimizations, IPCP (currently on mainline) should also be > > transformed to SSA. > > IPCP in SSA code exists on IPA branch, and will be submitted to GCC4.3 > > after IPA branch > >

Re: IPA branch

2006-10-01 Thread Razya Ladelsky
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2006 01:55:24: > Razya Ladelsky wrote: > > > Except for new optimizations, IPCP (currently on mainline) should also be > > transformed to SSA. > > IPCP in SSA code exists on IPA branch, and will be submitted to GCC4.3 > > after IPA branch > >

Re: IPA branch

2006-09-28 Thread Mark Mitchell
Jan Hubicka wrote: I intended to write the overview in a way to express that some work will be needed. Thank you for the detailed explanation. I think your plans all sound reasonable. I would definitely encourage you to start preparing patches and submitting them for review -- and hounding

Re: IPA branch

2006-09-28 Thread Mark Mitchell
Razya Ladelsky wrote: Except for new optimizations, IPCP (currently on mainline) should also be transformed to SSA. IPCP in SSA code exists on IPA branch, and will be submitted to GCC4.3 after IPA branch is committed and some testsuite regressions failing with IPCP+versioning+inlining are fix

Re: Re: IPA branch

2006-09-27 Thread Razya Ladelsky
Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM wrote on 27/09/2006 14:27:18: > > > > > > Jan -- > > > > I'm trying to plan for GCC 4.3 Stage 1. The IPA branch project is > > clearly a good thing, and you've been working on it for a long time, so > > I'd really like to get it into GCC 4.3. However, I'm a lit

Re: IPA branch

2006-09-25 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Jan -- > > I'm trying to plan for GCC 4.3 Stage 1. The IPA branch project is > clearly a good thing, and you've been working on it for a long time, so > I'd really like to get it into GCC 4.3. However, I'm a little > concerned, in reading the project description, that it's not all that > f

Re: IPA branch

2005-08-06 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Saturday 06 August 2005 08:14, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Aug 5, 2005, at 9:24 PM, Canqun Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Patch from Michael Matz > > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-07/msg00331.html) may partly fixes > > the multiple decls problems. > > That will only help with the fortran proble

Re: IPA branch

2005-08-06 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Saturday 06 August 2005 08:14, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Aug 5, 2005, at 9:24 PM, Canqun Yang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Patch from Michael Matz > > > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-07/msg00331.html) may partly fixes > > > the multiple decls problems. > > > > That will only help with

Re: IPA branch

2005-08-05 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Aug 5, 2005, at 9:24 PM, Canqun Yang wrote: Hi, Patch from Michael Matz (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-07/msg00331.html) may partly fixes the multiple decls problems. That will only help with the fortran problem, the C++ front-end have the same issue. The C front-end have still

Re: IPA branch

2005-08-05 Thread Canqun Yang
Hi, Patch from Michael Matz (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-07/msg00331.html) may partly fixes the multiple decls problems. I've tested and tuned this patch. It works, small functions can be inlined after DECL_INLINE flags (build_function_decl in trans-decl.c) have been set for them. The

Re: IPA branch

2005-08-05 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> I guess the web pages should be updated with something like the attached? Yes... > This looks fine to me. Thanks! Perhaps even cvs.html should mention > that tree-profiling was almost fully merged and retired? ...and, yes. ;-) Minor comments for the o

Re: IPA branch

2005-08-05 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Thursday 04 August 2005 19:12, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I've branches the IPA branch yesterday and re-directed current SPEC > > > testers running tree-profiling branch (now officially retired ;) to it. > > > ( http://www.suse.de/~aj/SPEC/amd64 ). > > > The branch should be used for i

Re: IPA branch

2005-08-04 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Thursday 04 August 2005 19:12, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Hi, > > I've branches the IPA branch yesterday and re-directed current SPEC > > testers running tree-profiling branch (now officially retired ;) to it. > > ( http://www.suse.de/~aj/SPEC/amd64 ). > > The branch should be used for interprocedur

Re: IPA branch

2005-08-04 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi, > I've branches the IPA branch yesterday and re-directed current SPEC > testers running tree-profiling branch (now officially retired ;) to it. > ( http://www.suse.de/~aj/SPEC/amd64 ). > The branch should be used for interprocedural optimization projects that > has serious chance to get into