On 25/11/2014 10:27, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:19:21AM +0100, Mason wrote:
Aaah, you want me to post the bug report to BZ, not here...
Yep - the snippet + command-line options you posted was enough to reproduce
the bug. The GCC mailing list is not for reporting bugs.
G
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:19:21AM +0100, Mason wrote:
> Aaah, you want me to post the bug report to BZ, not here...
Yep - the snippet + command-line options you posted was enough to reproduce
the bug. The GCC mailing list is not for reporting bugs.
> When you have a minute, can you take a look
Hello Marek,
On 25/11/2014 09:47, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Mason wrote:
This ICE may have gotten lost in the noise of my own message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00094.html
(The code snippet might be invalid C)
$ gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -S tes
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Mason wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This ICE may have gotten lost in the noise of my own message.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00094.html
>
> (The code snippet might be invalid C)
>
> $ gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -S test.c
> test.c: In function 'main':
> t