On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:27:14 -0800
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 01:26 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > So I would like to have "large data segment" feature!
> > Can you elaborate what exactly needs to be implemented?
> >
> > From what I see:
> > 0. We need additional flag for gcc: l
On 01/24/2011 11:40 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:26 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 01/22/2011 10:48 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>>> I've attached dirty patch. It has not very nice comments, tabs and spaces
>>> yet.
>>
>> Steve perhaps should weigh in here...
>
> I a
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:26 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 01/22/2011 10:48 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > I've attached dirty patch. It has not very nice comments, tabs and spaces
> > yet.
>
> Steve perhaps should weigh in here...
I am not very familiar with AUTO_PIC and NO_PIC. It wo
On 01/22/2011 10:48 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> I've attached dirty patch. It has not very nice comments, tabs and spaces yet.
Steve perhaps should weigh in here...
> As I understand, TARGET_AUTO_PIC, TARGET_CONSTANT_GP,
> TARGET_NO_PIC should somehow fall into different memory models.
> I do
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:27:14 -0800
Richard Henderson wrote:
> Depending on how Haskell programs are built, it may be better
> to avoid the GOT entirely. E.g.
>
> -mcmodel=large
>
> a-la the x86_64 port. This generates full 64-bit absolute
> relocations. For ia64 code this would look like
>
On 01/20/2011 01:26 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> So I would like to have "large data segment" feature!
> Can you elaborate what exactly needs to be implemented?
>
> From what I see:
> 0. We need additional flag for gcc: let's call it -mhuge-pic
>
> 1. We need to force GCC to generate any GP (r
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:47:49 -0800
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 01:17 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > BTW: This is on GCC Compile Farm IA64 machine. Now my question is: how
> > to solve this issue? Does GCC already support something Intel
> > discusses in 2008 here:
> > http://software.in
On 01/06/2011 01:17 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> BTW: This is on GCC Compile Farm IA64 machine. Now my question is: how
> to solve this issue? Does GCC already support something Intel
> discusses in 2008 here:
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/short-data-segment-overflow-error-on-linux-64-on-
