On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Revital1 Eres wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have one more question regarding the comment in
> tree-ssa-ccp.c file -
>
>
> /* Note that for propagation purposes, we are only interested in
> visiting statements that load the exact same memory reference
> store
Hello,
I have one more question regarding the comment in
tree-ssa-ccp.c file -
/* Note that for propagation purposes, we are only interested in
visiting statements that load the exact same memory reference
stored here. Those statements will have the exact same list
On 6/12/07, Revital1 Eres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The engine only knew how to propagate cases that always make the same
> set of vdef/vuses, so it was safe to only tell it to use the first
> vdef.
>
> /* Note that for propagation purposes, we are only interested in
> visiting stat
> The engine only knew how to propagate cases that always make the same
> set of vdef/vuses, so it was safe to only tell it to use the first
> vdef.
>
> /* Note that for propagation purposes, we are only interested in
> visiting statements that load the exact same memory reference
>
On 6/5/07, Revital1 Eres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can modify it to catch it pretty easily, just walk back a few vuses
> if the current set of vuses is defined by something that does not
> actually touch our offset.
This sounds like what I am trying to do in ccp...
> >
> > I am not sure I
> I can modify it to catch it pretty easily, just walk back a few vuses
> if the current set of vuses is defined by something that does not
> actually touch our offset.
This sounds like what I am trying to do in ccp...
> >
> > I am not sure I understand. The new patch uses the infrastructure of
On 6/4/07, Revital1 Eres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will greatly appreciate any suggestions regarding the following
> > problem I have with the ccp propagator. I am testing the new store
> > ccp patch which propagates constants by walking the virtual use-def
> > chain (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml
> > I will greatly appreciate any suggestions regarding the following
> > problem I have with the ccp propagator. I am testing the new store
> > ccp patch which propagates constants by walking the virtual use-def
> > chain (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00055.html) and I
> > encounte
On 6/3/07, Revital1 Eres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I will greatly appreciate any suggestions regarding the following
problem I have with the ccp propagator. I am testing the new store
ccp patch which propagates constants by walking the virtual use-def
chain (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pa
