On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ogier proposed to dump the outlined gimple to a file (i.e. LTO could
> do that) and then read this back in the SPU compiler. Does this
> approach sound right?
Yes, this was my idea also which is why I was waiting for L
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct. I was just trying to correct the idea that spu support was
> not committed to the FSF GCC. Considering I am a maintainer of it
> too, I don't want people to get the wrong thought there.
>
Ok, I got an email
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Huh??? Spu support is in gcc 4.3.0.
> >
>
> Ok, GCC4.3 can compile for Cell, but what is the status of libGOMP on
> Cell? Is there an eff
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Huh??? Spu support is in gcc 4.3.0.
>
Ok, GCC4.3 can compile for Cell, but what is the status of libGOMP on
Cell? Is there an efficient port of libGOMP for Cell? I assume that
the linux port could be used for Cell, bu
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2008, at 6:52, Ogier Maitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.
I'm student in master, and I'm at this time in a internship named
"Parallelization on Cell processor".
We are interested in porting libgomp an cell processor.
Like you maybe know, cell proc uses t
