On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > PR90348 is certainly entertaining. But I guess for a GSoC project
> > we need a more elaborate implementation plan. The above suggesting
> > of a "lifetime start" is IMHO a no-go btw. Instead I think
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
> PR90348 is certainly entertaining. But I guess for a GSoC project
> we need a more elaborate implementation plan. The above suggesting
> of a "lifetime start" is IMHO a no-go btw. Instead I think the
> only feasible way is to make all references indir
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> following the conversation in PR 90348, I wonder if it would make sense
> to suggest the idea presented there as a potential GSoC topic? Like this:
>
> **Enhance GIMPLE IR to represent lifetimes explicitly** At the moment,
> GCC internal re
