Thanks. I will use plain text.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:32 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 10:24, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > I tried to send you Aligned patch and one csmith program but it bounces
> > back. I don't know why it happened. Sorry for sending mail 5 times. Sure,
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 10:24, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> I tried to send you Aligned patch and one csmith program but it bounces
> back. I don't know why it happened. Sorry for sending mail 5 times. Sure, I
> will reply to single thread.
If you're trying to send email to the GCC lists you need to u
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:23 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > void func_1();
> > void func_3();
> > .
> >
> > void foo1() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_1")));
> > void foo3() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_3")));
>
> Hi.
>
> In all emails that yo
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > Hello Martin and community,
>
> Hi Shubham.
>
> Thank you for starting working on the project. There are some
> recommendations
> before we fully being:
>
> 1) I've recently received 5 emails tha
On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> void func_1();
> void func_3();
> .
>
> void foo1() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_1")));
> void foo3() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_3")));
Hi.
In all emails that you sent there's no patch that will implement 'alias'
attribute.
Thanks,
On 5/15/19 10:12 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hello Martin and community,
>
> Below is attached patch for Function Attribute Aligned -
>
> The command line option to generate aligned attribute is -
> --func-attr-aligned which can be found in ./csmith --help
>
> Please review the patch and sugge
On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hello Martin and community,
Hi Shubham.
Thank you for starting working on the project. There are some recommendations
before we fully being:
1) I've recently received 5 emails that have very similar subject and it's
unclear why that happened? When
On 4/4/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> Hello Joshi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
HI,
Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
review and suggest
>>>
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
> On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hello Joshi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>>> HI,
>>> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
>>> review and suggest
>>> necessary changes.
>>> If some OpenMP expert
On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello Joshi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> HI,
>> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
>> review and suggest
>> necessary changes.
>> If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please
>> suggest.
>
Hello Joshi,
On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
> HI,
> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
> review and suggest
> necessary changes.
> If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please suggest.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1axElw-I
HI,
Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
review and suggest
necessary changes.
If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please suggest.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1axElw-I5pTwcjI4iMle5NhLeRCcshIjH5ZHm3GGwsZU/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks,
Sameera
On 3/26/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> That is a correct diagnostics.
>>
>> See Canonical loop form.
>>
>> test-exprOne of the following:
>> var relational-op b
>> b relational-op var
>>
>> ( var relational-op b )
>> is neither of those.
>
> Still se
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote my GSoC Proposal to the "Parallelize GCC with threads" project,
> and if someone is interested in it, I am linking the text here in order
> to get feedback. Please let me know if something is not entirely clear,
> or if there are an
Hello Akshatg,
On Tue, Mar 12 2019, Akshatg wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a 2nd year Master's student at IIT Bombay. I have taken advance
> compiler related courses in the past semesters. I'm interested to work
> on the project "Make C/C++ not automatically promote
> memory_order_consume to memor
ent/d/1UwrBOsiAXsZSClsq1r6tAEw6QdqUzJvgW74SQpcWlIU/edit?usp=sharing
Ray Kim.
-Original Message-
From: "Martin Jambor"
To: "김규래"; ;
Cc: "Jakub Jelinek";
Sent: 2019-03-26 (화) 08:32:51 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: [GSoC 2019] No application template?
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 24 2019, 김규래 wrote:
> That is a correct diagnostics.
>
> See Canonical loop form.
>
> test-expr One of the following:
> var relational-op b
> b relational-op var
>
> ( var relational-op b )
> is neither of those.
Still seems strange to fail for some meaningle
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:30:28PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> > I'd need to see an example of what you are talking about.
>
> int i;
> #pragma omp parallel for
> for (i = (0) ; (i< (20)) ; i++) {
> printf ("\ntest expression fails due to brackets");
>
On 3/26/19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:41:26PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> sameeran joshi writes:
>>
>> > On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> >>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>> >>> checks for th
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:41:26PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> sameeran joshi writes:
>
> > On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> >>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
> >>> checks for the conditions related to a structured blo
sameeran joshi writes:
> On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>>> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
>>> 1.no returns in block
>>
>> returns should be allowed insid
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 24 2019, 김규래 wrote:
> Hello,
> I was trying to write my application for GSoC 2019 but couldn't find an
> application form for GCC.
> Some other organizations seem to have GSoC application forms/templates.
> The gcc GSoC wiki page doesn't mention any.
> Is the application format fr
On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
>> 1.no returns in block
>
> returns should be allowed inside statement expressions.
If I a
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
> 1.no returns in block
returns should be allowed inside statement expressions.
> 2.no gotos
> 3.no breaks
> a
Hi,
I tried doing a basic/incomplete patch(needs more detailed conditions
check) for implementing a structured block in Csmith code base.
The structured block is almost needed for most of the constructs which
would be further implemented.
0)
The patch identifies and labels each block(after block cr
Hello Sameeran,
On Sun, Feb 10 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
> Hi,I am an undergraduate student currently in final year of computer
> science and engineering degree course from Pune University, India. I
> and Shubham have been working on Last year's GSoC project idea :
>
> Implement a fuzzer leverag
Hello Parashuram,
On Tue, Feb 12 2019, Shourya IIT B wrote:
> Respected Sir,
>
>I am Parashuram Shourya from India. Currently, I am doing my
> Master’s in Geoinformatics from Centre of Studies in Resources
> Engineering(CSRE),
> Indian Institute of Technology Bombay(IITB). I have a Bachelo
27 matches
Mail list logo
